The methodology for evaluation of environmental education programmes for adults

Authors

  • Jan Činčera

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.415

Keywords:

evaluation, qualitative, quantitative, programme

Abstract

The methodology provides a comprehensive overview of instruments aimed for evaluation of environmental education programmes for adults. It introduces specific featurs of evaluation of programmes focused on this target group and defines relevant variables for environmental education. It compares and contrasts differences between evaluation of community-based programmes, professional training courses, and environmental interpretation programmes. It compares and discusses strategies for their quantitative and qualitative evaluation. Examples of evaluation research from Czech and abroad are provided.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Jan Činčera

Technical University of Liberec, Department of Education and Psychology & Masaryk University Brno, Department of Environmental Studies

References

Argyris, C. (1976). Single-Loop and Double-Loop Models in Research on Decision Making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(3), 363-375. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2391848?origin=crossref http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2391848

Argyris, C. (1995). Action science and organizational learning. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 10(6), 20-26. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/02683949510093849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02683949510093849

Adomssent, M., & Michelsen, G. (2006). German academia heading for sustainability? Reflection on policy and practice in teaching, research and institutional innovation. Environmental education research, 12(1), 85-99. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504620500527758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504620500527758

Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50(2), 179-211. Retrieved from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/074959789190020T http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Amburgey, J. W., & Thoman, D. B. (2012). Dimensionality of the New ecological paradigm: issues of factor structure and measurement. Environment and Behavior, 44(2), 235-256. Retrieved from http://eab.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0013916511402064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916511402064

Ardoin, N. M., Schuh, J. S., & Gould, R. K. (2012). Exploring the dimensions of place: a confirmatory factor analysis of data from three ecoregional sites. Environmental Education Research, 18(5), 583-607. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504622.2011.640930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.640930

Back, L. & Cable, T, (2002). Interpretation for the 21st century. Champaign. : Sagamore publishing.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. Retrieved from http://content.apa.org/journals/rev/84/2/191 pmid:847061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Bennett, D. B. (1989). Evaluating Environmental Education in Schools. A practical guide for teachers. : UNESCO - UNEP, Division of Science, Technical and Environmental Education. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0006/000661/066120eo.pdf

Beňková, V., & Činečera, J. (2010). Prožitkové naučné stezky jako prostředek environmentální interpretace krajiny. Envigogika, 5(2), Retrieved from http://www.envigogika.cuni.cz/index.php/Envigogika/article/view/51 http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/18023061.51

Boyes, E., Chambers, W., & Stanisstreet, M. (1995). Trainee primary teachers’ ideas about the ozone layer. Environmental Education Research, 1(2), 133-145. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1350462950010201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1350462950010201

Broukal, V., Toušková, B., & Broukalová, L. (2012). Výroční zpráva 2011. Praha: Sdružení středisek ekologické výchovy Pavučina.

BROUKALOVÁ, L. a kol. (2012). Cíle a indikátory pro environmentální vzdělávání, výchovu a osvětu v České republice. Praha: Ministerstvo životního prostředí České republiky. Dostupné z WWW: <http://www.mzp.cz/cz/cile_indikatory_evvo_dokument>

Casakin, H., & Billig, M. (2009). Effect on settlement size and religiozity on sense of place in communcal settlements. Environment and behavior, 41(6), 821-835. Retrieved from http://eab.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0013916508329944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916508329944

Cordano, M., Welcomer, S. A., & Scherer, R. F. (2003). An analysis of the predictive validity of the new ecological paradigm scale. The Journal of Environmental Education, 34(3), 22-28. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00958960309603490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00958960309603490

Cox, J.R. (2009). Environmental communication and the public sphere. Washington: SAGE.

Činčera, J., & Bezouška, A. (2007). Vliv environmentální profilace středních škol na proenvironmentální postoje a jednání žáků. Envigogika, 2(3), Retrieved from http://www.envigogika.cuni.cz/index.php/Envigogika/article/view/20 http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/18023061.20

Činčera, J., Gilar, P., & Sokolovičová, J. (2010). Specializační studium pro koordinátory environmentální výchovy, vzdělávání a osvěty: interpretace a efektivita z pohledu absolventů. Envigogika, 5(1), Retrieved from http://www.envigogika.cuni.cz/index.php/Envigogika/article/view/47 http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/18023061.47

Činčera, J., Kohoutová, K. and Sokolovičová, J., (2010). Účastníci specializačního studia pro koordinátory environmentální výchovy: očekávání, hodnocení a první přínosy. Envigogika, 5(3), Retrieved from http://www.envigogika.cuni.cz/index.php/Envigogika/article/view/55 http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/18023061.55

Činčera, J. and Štěpánek, P., (2007). Výzkum ekologické gramotnosti studentů středních odborných škol. Envigogika, 2(1), Retrieved from http://www.envigogika.cuni.cz/index.php/Envigogika/article/view/12 http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/18023061.12

Činčera, J. (2010). Metodika evaluace programů environmentální výchovy. Envigogika, 5(3), Retrieved from http://www.envigogika.cuni.cz/index.php/Envigogika/article/view/149 http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/18023061.149

Daudi, S.S. (2000). Environmental literacy: a challenging concept for neo-literate communities? Washington: NAAEE conference proceedings.

DIAMOND, J., LUKE J.J. & UTTAL, D.H. (2009). Practical evaluation guide. Tool for museums and other informal educational settings. Plymouth: Altamira Press.

Dillon, P. J., & Gayford, C. G. (1997). A psychometric approach to investigating the environmental beliefs, intentions and behaviours of pre-service teachers. Environmental Education Research, 3(3), 283-297. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1350462970030303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1350462970030303

Disinger, J. F. (1997). Environment in the K-12 Curriculum: An Overview. In WILKE, Richard J. Environmental Education. Teacher Ressource Handbook. A Practical Guide for K-12 Environmental Education. Thousand Oaks: Corwin, 23-44.

Disinger, J. F., & Roth, C. F. (1992). Environmental literacy. Environmental literacy. ERIC Clearinghouse for Science Mathematics and Environmental Education, ED3512012, Retrieved from http://www.ericdigests.org/1992-1/literacy.htm

Dove, J. (1996). Student teacher understanding of the greenhouse effect, ozone layer depletion and acid rain. Environmental Education Research, 2(1), 89-100. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1350462960020108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1350462960020108

Dunlap, R. E. (2008). The New environmental paradigm scale: from marginality to worldwide use. The Journal of environmental education, 40(1), 3-18. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3200/JOEE.40.1.3-18 http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.40.1.3-18

Dunlap, R. E., & Van_Liere, K. D. (1978). The „new environmental paradigm“: A proposed instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education, 9(4), 10-19. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875

Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Johnson, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revisited NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425-442. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/0022-4537.00176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176

Dutcher, D., Finley, J., Luloff, A., & Johnson, J. (2007). Connectivity with nature as a measure of environmental values. Environment and Behavior, 39(4), 474-493. Retrieved from http://eab.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0013916506298794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916506298794

Dvořáčková, S. and Ryplová, R., (2012). Sonda environmentální gramotnosti studentů přírodovědně a ekologicky zaměřených oborů na Pedagogické fakultě JU. Envigogika, 7(3), Retrieved from http://www.envigogika.cuni.cz/index.php/Envigogika/article/view/77 http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/18023061.77

Ernst, J. A., Monroe, M. C., & Simmons, B. (2009). Evaluating your environmental education program. A workbook for practitioners. Washington: NAAEE.

Fielding, K. S., & Head, B. W. (2012). Determinants of young Australians’ environmental actions: the role of responsibility attributions, locus of control, knowledge and attitudes. Environmental Education Research, 18(2), 171-186. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504622.2011.592936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.592936

Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2004). Program Evaluation. Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. Boston: Pearson Education.

Franek, M. (2012). Nature Relatedness Scale. Český překlad nástroje. Envigogika, 7(1), http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/18023061.69

FRANĚK, M. (2006). Výzkum antropocentrických a biocentrických postojů k přírodě v české populaci. In STREJČKOVÁ, Emilie. Výzkum odcizování člověka přírodě : Závěrečná zpráva [online]. Praha: Toulcův dvůr, 2006.

FRECHTLING, J. et. al. (2002). The 2002 User-Friendly Handbook for Project Evaluation. The National Science Foundation. Dostupné z WWW: <http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2002/nsf02057/nsf02057.pdf>

GLASER, B. G., (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. San Franciso: Sociology Press.

GLASER, B. G., (1998). Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.

Goldman, D., Yavetz, B., & Pe’er, S. (2006). Environmental literacy in Teacher training in Israel: Environmental Behavior of New Studies. The Journal of Environmental Education, 38(1), 3-23. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3200/JOEE.38.1.3-22 http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.38.1.3-22

HAM, S. H. (1992). Environmental interpretation: a practical guide for people with big ideas and small budgets. Colorado: Fulcrum Publishing.

Hayward, G., Diduck, A., & Mitchell, B. (2007). Social Learning Outcomes in the Red River Floodway Environmental Assessment. Environmental Practice, 9(4), 239-250. Retrieved from http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S1466046607070561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1466046607070561

Hsu, S. J., & Roth, R. E. (1998). An assessment of environmental literacy and analysis of predictors of responsible environmental behavior held by secondary teachers in the Hualien area of Taiwan. Environmental Education Research, 4(3), 229-249. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1350462980040301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1350462980040301

Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing Learner Behavior through Environmental Education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8-21. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00958964.1990.10753743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1990.10753743

Ignat, A. A., & Clipa, O. (2010). The Impact of Self-Efficacy and Locus of Control on the Professional Development of the Teachers. Buletinul Universitatii Petrol-Gaze din Ploiesti, 12(1), 180-185.

KIRKPATRICK, D.L. & KIRKPATRICK, J.D. (2007). Implementing the four levels. A practical guide for effective evaluation of training programs. San Franciso: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Knapp, D., Volk, T. L., & Hungerford, H. R. (1997). The identification of empirically derived goals for program development in environmental interpretation. The Journal of Environmental Education, 3(3), 24-34. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00958964.1997.9942826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1997.9942826

Knapp, D. (1997). Environmental Education and Environmental Interpretation: The Relationships. National Association for Interpretation, 3, 349-356.

Kudryavtsev, A., Stedman, R. C., & Krasny, M. E. (2012). Sense of place in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 2(18), 229-250. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504622.2011.609615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.609615

KUSTERS, C.S.L. et al. (2011). Making evaluation matter: a practical guide for evaluators. Wageningen: Centre for development and innovation, Wageningen university.

Kyle, G., Graeffe, A., & Manning, R. (2005). Testing the dimensionality of place attachment in recreational settings. Environment and Behavior, 37(2), 153-177. Retrieved from http://eab.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0013916504269654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916504269654

LaLonde, R., & Jackson, E. L. (2002). The New Environmental Paradigm scale: Has it outlived its usefulness. The Journal of Environmental Education, 32(4), 28-37. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00958960209599151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00958960209599151

La Trobe, , H L, , & Acott, T. G. (2000). A modified NEP/DSP environmental attitudes scale. The Journal of Environmental Education, 32(1), 12-20. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00958960009598667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00958960009598667

Lukas, K. E., & Ross, S. R. (2005). Zoo visitor knowledge and attitudes toward gorillas and chimpanzees. Journal of Environmental Education, 36(4), 33.

Lundmark, C. (2007). The new ecological paradigm revisited: anchoring the NEP scale in environmental ethics. Environmental Education Research, 13(3), 329-347. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504620701430448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504620701430448

Madin, E. M. P., & Fenton, D. Mark, (2004). Environmental Interpretation in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park: An Assessment of Programme Effectiveness. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 12(2), 121-137. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09669580408667228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09669580408667228

Matějčeek, T. and Bartoš, J., (2012). Environmentální gramotnost učitelů a studentů učitelství. Envigogika, 7(2), Retrieved from http://www.envigogika.cuni.cz/index.php/Envigogika/article/view/75 http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/18023061.75

Mayer, F. S., Frantz, M., Bruehlman-senecal, C., E,, , & Dolliver, K. (2009). Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and behavior, 41(5), 607-645. Retrieved from http://eab.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0013916508319745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916508319745

Mayer, S. F., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503-515. Retrieved from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0272494404000696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001

Measham, T. G. (2009). Social Learning Through Evaluation: A Case study of Overcoming Constraints for Management Dryland Salinity. Environmental Management, 43(6), 1096-1107. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-008-9265-5 pmid:19194644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9265-5

MEZIROW, J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult. Core concepts of transformation theory. In Mezirow, Jack et. al. (ed.) (2000): Learning as Transformation. Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 3-33.

Morrone, M., Mancl, K., & Carr, K. (2001). Development of a metric to test group differences in ecological knowledge as one component of environmental literacy. The Journal of Environmental Education, 32(4), 33-43. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00958960109598661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00958960109598661

MOSELY, C. & REINKE, K. (2005). The Effect of Teaching in an Outdoor Environmental Education Program on Elementary Pre-service Teachers’ Environmental Education Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectancy. In B. Simmons (Ed.) Preparing Effective Environmental Educators. Washington: NAAEE. P. 35-58.

Munro, J. K., & Morrison-saunders, A. (2008). Environmental interpretation evaluation in natural areas. Journal of ecotourism, 8(1), 1-14. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2167/joe137.0 http://dx.doi.org/10.2167/joe137.0

Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). The Nature relatedness scale. Linking individuals' connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 715-740. Retrieved from http://eab.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0013916508318748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916508318748

PASTOROVÁ, M. a kol., (2011). Doporučené očekávané výstupy. Metodická podpora pro výuku průřezových témat na základních školách. Praha: Výzkumný ústav pedagogický. Retrieved from http://www.vuppraha.cz/nova-publikace-divize-vup-%E2%80%93-doporucene-ocekavane-vystupy-pro-zakladni-skoly

PASTOROVÁ, M. a kol., (2011). Doporučené očekávané výstupy. Metodická podpora pro výuku průřezových témat v gymnáziích. Praha: Národní ústav pro vzdělávání, školské poradenské zařízení a zařízení pro další vzdělávání pedagogických pracovníků. Retrieved from http://digifolio.rvp.cz/artefact/file/download.php?file=35427&view=4001

PATTON, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

PATTON, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-Focused Evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

POSTAREFF, L. (2007). Teaching in Higher Education. From Content-focused to Learning-focused Approaches to Training. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.

Pe’, E. R., Goldman, S., D,, , & Yavetz, B. (2007). Environmental literacy in teacher training: attitudes, knowledge, and environmental behavior of beginning students. The Journal of Environmental Education, 39(1), 45-59. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3200/JOEE.39.1.45-59 http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.39.1.45-59

Rist, S., Chiddambaranathan, M., Escobar, C., & Wiesmann, U. (2006). It was Hard to Come to Mutual Understanding . . .”—The Multidimensionality of Social Learning Processes Concerned with Sustainable Natural Resource Use in. India, Africa and Latin America. Syst Pract Act Res, 19(3), 219-237. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11213-006-9014-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11213-006-9014-8

ROSSI, P. H., LIPSEY, M.W. & FREEMAN, H.E. (2004). Evaluation. A Systemic Approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

SCHOVAJSOVÁ, J. (2010). Současný stav environmentální výchovy na základních školách – vybrané aspekty environmentální gramotnosti dětí mladšího školního věku. Disertační práce. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého.

Schneider, F., Fry, P., Lederman, T., & Rist, S. (2009). Social Learning Processes in Swiss Soil Protection – The “From Farmer. Social Learning Processes in Swiss Soil Protection – The “From Farmer – To Farmer” Project. Human Ecology, 37, 475-489.

Schultz, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4), 327-339. Retrieved from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0272494401902270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0227

SIMMONS, B. (2008). Designing Evaluation for Education Projects. Office of Education and Sustainable Development. Dostupné z WWW: <http://wateroutreach.uwex.edu/use/documents/NOAAEvalmanualFINAL.pdf >

SOUKUP, P. (2001). ISSP: životní prostředí. Praha: Sociologický ústav Akademie věd České republiky.

Stables, A., & Bishop, K. (2001). Weak and Strong Conceptions of Environmental Literacy: implications for environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 7(1), 89-97. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504620125643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504620125643

STOKKING, H., VAN AERT, L., MEIJBERG, W & KASKENS, A. (1999). Evaluating Evironmental Education. IUCN Commission on Education and Communication CEC. Dostupné z WWW: <http://www.iucn.org/wp2003/books/pdf/cec4.pdf >

Swanagan, J. S. (2000). Factors influencing ZOO visitors’ conservation attitudes and behavior. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(4), 26-31. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00958960009598648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00958960009598648

TILDEN, F. (2007). Interpreting Our Heritage. Chapell Hill: University of North Carolina.

Tuncer, G., Tekkaya, C., Sungur, S., Cakiroglu, J., Ertepinar, H., & Kaplowitz, M. (2009). Assessing pre-service teachers’ environmental literacy in Turkey as a mean to develop teacher education programs. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(4), 426-436. Retrieved from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S073805930800120X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2008.10.003

Van Petegem, P., & Blieck, A. (2006). The environmental worldview of children: a cross‐cultural perspective. Environmental Education Research, 12(5), 625-635. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504620601053662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504620601053662

Vikan, A., Camino, C., Biaggio, A., & Nordvik, H. (2007). Endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a comparison of two Brazilian samples and one Norwegian sample. Environment and Behavior, 39(2), 317-228. Retrieved from http://eab.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0013916506286946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916506286946

Wals, A. (2012). Learning our way out of unsustainability: The role of environmental education. In Clayton, S. The Oxford Handbook of Environment and Conservation. Oxford: Oxford university press, 628-644.. Oxford: Oxford university.

Wals, A., Geerling-eijff, F., Hubeek, F., Van_der_kroon, S., & Vader, J. (2008). All mixed up? Instrumental and emancipator learning toward a more sustainable world: considerations for EE policymakers. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 7(3), 55-65. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15330150802473027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15330150802473027

WALS, A.E.J. (ed.) 2007. Social learning: towards a sustainable world: principles, perspectives, and praxis. Wageningen Academic,Wageningen, Netherlands

Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems. Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems. Organization, 7(2), 225-246.

WHOLEY, J.S., HATRY H.P. & NEWCOMER, K.E. (2004). Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Wright, J. M. (2008). The Comparative Effects of Constructivist Versus Traditional Teaching Methods on the Environmental Literacy of Postsecondary Nonscience Majors. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 28(4), 324-337. Retrieved from http://bst.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0270467608319638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0270467608319638

YAVETZ, B., GOLDMAN, D. & PE’ER, S. (2009). Environmental literacy of pre-service teachers in Israel: a comparison between students at the onset and end of their studies. Environmental education research, 15, 4, 393-415.

Published

31. 12. 2013

How to Cite

Činčera, J. (2013). The methodology for evaluation of environmental education programmes for adults. Envigogika, 8(5). https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.415

Issue

Section

Methodologies