Future-Oriented Thinking in the Czech Curriculum

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.714

Keywords:

sustainable development, primary education, sustainability values, anticipatory competence, curriculum, educational goals, future

Abstract

This article examines how future thinking and anticipatory competencies are integrated into education, with a particular focus on the Czech curricular context. Drawing on international frameworks developed by UNESCO and the OECD, it outlines key theoretical approaches to future‑oriented thinking and demonstrates its importance for cultivating imagination, critical thinking, and action competence. The article highlights how anticipatory competencies shape personal, civic, and professional dimensions of education: psychologically, they support the development of a forward‑looking perspective in children and adolescents, who often struggle to structure pathways toward their goals; they are essential for addressing contemporary societal challenges, including those associated with climate‑related risks; and they underpin participatory decision‑making and informed engagement with society.

Because anticipatory competence is a prerequisite for preparing learners to actively shape a sustainable future, it must be intentionally developed from the earliest stages of schooling using appropriate pedagogical methods. The research presented here investigates the extent to which the current Czech curriculum aligns with international trends in this regard. Through a qualitative comparison of the revised Czech curricular documents with the UNESCO framework and GreenComp, the study analyses how various aspects of anticipation are embedded within the three key competencies that define national educational goals. The findings reveal that, although certain anticipatory elements related to citizenship and sustainability, personal and social development, and entrepreneurship and work are present, several crucial dimensions remain insufficiently integrated. These include the ability to work with uncertainty, formulate socially relevant goals, negotiate visions of the future, critically evaluate proposals and plans, and pursue transformative change.

The study contributes to ongoing discussions about the aims of the revised curriculum for elementary education in the context of sustainability. Its findings offer insights that can inform both educational practice and the continued development of curricular documents.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Jana Dlouhá, Charles University

    Researcher in Charles University Environment Centre; co-founder of the Enviwiki knowledge base; vice-president of international network of higher education institutions Copernicus Alliance. Concerned with transformative education and educational transformation in the light of sustainable development; interests span from digital media, open education resources, to social learning and participatory approaches in public dialogue.

References

Bianchi, G., Pisiotis, U., Cabrera Giraldez, M. (2022). GreenComp: The European Sustainability Competence Framework. Luxembourg Publications Office of the European Union. 2022 [cit. 2024-08-06]. EUR 30955 EN. ISBN 978-92-76-53195-1. https://doi.org/10.2760/7024

Boström, M., Andersson, E., Berg, M., Gustafsson, K., Gustavsson, E., Hysing, E., ... Öhman, J. (2018). Conditions for transformative learning for sustainable development: A theoretical review and approach. Sustainability, 10(12), 4479. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124479

Bound, H., Tan, J. P., Ying, R. L. W. (Eds.). (2022). Pedagogies for future-oriented adult learners: Flipping the lens from teaching to learning. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92867-4

CASE (2018). (Competencies for a sustainable socio-economic development). Competencies Tool: Nástroj pro rozvoj kompetencí pro udržitelný socio-ekonomický rozvoj [online]. [cit. 2023-11-15]. Dostupné z: https://www.case-ka.eu/wp/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Competencies-Tool_CS.pdf

De Haan, G. (2006). The BLK “21” programme in Germany: A “Gestaltungskompetenz”-based model for Education for Sustainable Development. Environmental Education Research, 12(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620500526362

Dlouhá, J., Heras, R., Mulà, I., Salgado, F. P., Henderson, L. (2019). Competences to address SDGs in higher education—A reflection on the equilibrium between systemic and personal approaches to achieve transformative action. Sustainability, 11(13), 3664. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133664

Dvořáková, M. (2012). Teorie transformativního učení (se) dospělých. Studia paedagogica, 17(1), 59-74. https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2012-1-4

Eurydice. (2024). Learning for sustainability in Europe: Building competences and supporting teachers and schools. Publications Office of the European Union / Dům zahraniční spolupráce. Online: https://www.dzs.cz/sites/default/files/2024-04/Learning_for_sustainability_in_Europe_Building_competences_and_supporting_teachers_and_schools.pdf

Fidler, D. (2011). Foresight defined as a component of strategic management. Futures, 43(5), 540–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.02.005

Flick, U. (Ed.). (2014). The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis. SAGE Publications. Online https://www.ufs.ac.za/docs/librariesprovider68/resources/methodology/uwe_flick_(ed-)-_the_sage_handbook_of_qualitative(z-lib-org)-(1).pdf?sfvrsn=db96820_

Gidley, J. M. (2001). ‘Education for all’ or education for wisdom? Unfolding learning societies: Deepening the dialogues. In Unfolding Learning Societies: Deepening the Dialogues (pp. 210–223). Vimla Press. https://www.academia.edu/download/46260733/Gidley_Wisdom_Education_2001.pdf

Gidley, J. M., Bateman, D., Smith, C. (2004). Futures in education: Principles, practices and potential (Monograph No. 5; R. A. Slaughter (Ed.), Strategic Foresight Monograph Series). RMIT University. https://research-repository.rmit.edu.au/articles/book/Futures_in_Education_Principles_practices_and_potential_monograph_No_5_the_strategic_foresight_monograph_series/27603651/1/files/50770158.pdf

Henderson, L., Dlouhá, J. (2021). Myšlení budoucnosti a potřebnost transformativního přístupu ve vzdělávání. Envigogika, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.621

Henderson, L., Kuříková, M. (2021). Kreativní vzdělávání pro udržitelnou budoucnost: Metodické inspirace projektu Vzdělávání pro budoucnost. Centrum pro otázky životního prostředí Univerzity Karlovy. https://www.czp.cuni.cz/knihovna/kreativ_vzdel.pdf

Henderson, L., Kuříková, M., Kroufek, R. (2021). Syntéza kreativního učení a vzdělávání pro udržitelný rozvoj v České republice. Envigogika, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.628

Hicks, D. (2002). Postmodern education: A futures perspective. In R. A. Slaughter (Ed.), Advancing Futures: New Horizons and Strategic Insights (pp. 321–330). Praeger.

Hochmanová, K. (2026). Anticipační kompetence a hledisko budoucnosti v českém kurikulu pro základní vzdělávání [Diplomová práce, Univerzita Karlova]. Digitální repozitář UK. https://dspace.cuni.cz/handle/20.500.11956/206900

Holfelder, A. K. (2019). Towards a sustainable future with education? Sustainability Science, 14(4), 943–952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00682-z

Inayatullah, S. (2008). Six pillars: Futures thinking for transforming. Foresight, 10(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680810855991

Jickling, B., Wals, A. E. (2008). Globalization and environmental education: Looking beyond sustainable development. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270701684667

Julien, M., Chalmeau, R., Vergnolle Mainar, C., Léna, J. Y. (2018). An innovative framework for encouraging future thinking in ESD: A case study in a French school. Futures, 101, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.04.012

Kollmuss, A., Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401

Komenský, J. A. (1992). Obecná porada o nápravě věcí lidských (Sv. III). Svoboda.

Kutscheauer, A. (2004). Prognostika jako nauka. Makroekonomická analýza. ALkut.cz. http://www.alkut.cz/rap_htm/reap03.htm#kap11

Květina, J. (2016). Koncepce liberalismu a demokracie v edukačním procesu: Dekonstrukce neoliberální dominance v RVP. Pedagogika, 66(3), 312–329. https://doi.org/10.14712/23362189.2015.722

Lewin, K. (1942). Time Perspectiveand Morale. In WATSON, G. (Ed.). Civilian Morale. Boston: Houghton Rifflein, 482 p.

Lochman, M., et al. (2022). Foresight: Metodická příručka. České priority. https://www.ceskepriority.cz/files/metodicka-prirucka.pdf

Lucas, B., Claxton, G., Spencer, E. (2013). Progression in student creativity in school: First steps towards new forms of formative assessments. Contemporary Readings in Law Social Justice, 6(2). Online: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/progression -in-student-creativity-in-school_5k4dp59msdwk-en.html

Mazáčová, N. Role základní školy v rozvíjení perspektivní orientace žáků. In: Maňák, J., Janík, T. (2007). Absolvent základní školy. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, Pedagogická fakulta, s. 58-65. ISBN 978-80-210-4402-9. [cit. 2024-08-07]. Dostupné z:

https://old.ped.muni.cz/weduresearch/publikace/mj07.pdf#page=58

Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of transformative education, 1(1), 58-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344603252172

Miller, R. (2007). Futures Literacy: A Hybrid Strategic Scenario Method. Futures, 39(4), 341–362. 〈https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016328706002035 〉.

Miller, R. (2018). Transforming the future: Anticipation in the 21st century. UNESCO / Routledge. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000264644

Ministerstvo školství, mládeže a tělovýchovy. (2024). Základní vzdělávání - Revize RVP. MŠMT. https://prohlednout.rvp.cz/zakladni-vzdelavani/

Novotná, H., Špaček, O., Štovíčková, M. (2019). Metody výzkumu ve společenských vědách. Fakulta humanitních studií Univerzity Karlovy.

OECD. (2019). OECD Learning Compass 2030: Conceptual learning framework. OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030. Online https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/about/projects/edu/education-2040/concept-notes/OECD_Learning_Compass_2030_concept_note.pdf

Pavelková, I. (1990). Perspektivní orientace jako činitel rozvoje osobnosti [online]. Praha: Academia. [cit. 2024-05-17]. ISBN 80-200-0055-0.

Pavelková, I. (2003). Vztah žáků k budoucnosti. In Sociální a kulturní souvislosti výchovy a vzdělávání: Sborník příspěvků z 11. konference ČAPV [online]. Česká asociace pedagogického výzkumu. [cit. 2024-06-04]. Dostupné z: https://www.ped.muni.cz/capv11/1sekce/1_capv_pavelkova.pdf

Pavelková, I., Vitošková, M. (2016). Vztah žáků a studentů k budoucnosti. Lifelong Learning – celoživotní vzdělávání, 6(3), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.11118/lifele2016060353

Rezek, Š. (2023). ForSI – úvod do foresightu. Podporujeme inovace. https://www.podporujemeinovace.cz/forsi-uvod-do-foresightu/

Seginer, R. (2009). Future orientation: Developmental and ecological perspectives [online]. New York: Springer Science & Business Media. [cit. 2024-06-04]. ISBN 978-0-387-88641-1. https://doi.org/10.1007/b106810

Shaull, R. (1970) Foreword. In P. Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed, trans. M. B. Ramos (New York: Continuum), 9–15

Slaughter, R. A. (1997). Developing and applying strategic foresight. ABN Report, 5(10), 13–27.

Sokol, J. (2000). Člověk jako osoba. Institut základů vzdělanosti Univerzity Karlovy. https://is.muni.cz/www/384/30618506/koncepty/Jan-Sokol-Clovek-jako-osoba.pdf

Somr, M. (2011). Komenského etické vize o nápravě věcí lidských. Littera Scripta, 4(1), 79–90. https://www.littera-scripta.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/1_PDFsam_19_PDFsam_9_PDFsam_13_PDFsam_11_PDFsam_9_PDFsam_23_PDFsam_LS_1_2011.pdf

Trnečková, J. a Valouch, J. (2021). Komparace prognostických metod. In: Mladá věda [online]. Zlín: Univerzita Tomáše Bati ve Zlíně, Fakulta aplikované informatiky. [cit. 2024-05-06]. Dostupné z: https://trilobit.fai.utb.cz/Data/Articles/PDF/92393f4a-7843-4c82-8401-545a3b20c5b7.pdf

Tupý, J. (2024). Srovnání principů českého Školského zákona, dokumentů UNESCO a OECD.

UNESCO. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. UNESCO publishing. Online https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444

UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. International Commission on the Futures of Education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707

Vesterinen, M. M., Ratinen, I. (2024). Sustainability competences in primary school education–a systematic literature review. Environmental Education Research, 30(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2023.2170984

Vidergor, H. E. (2023). Teaching futures thinking literacy and futures studies in schools. Futures, 146, Article 103083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.103083

Wiek, A., Withycombe, L., Redman, C. L. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science, 6(2), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0132-6

Yuksel, N., Cifci, H., Cakir, S. (2017). New foresight generation and framework of foresight. PressAcademia Procedia, 5(1), 224–233. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.593

Downloads

Published

17. 06. 2026

Issue

Section

Reviewed Papers

How to Cite

Hochmanová, K., & Dlouhá, J. (2026). Future-Oriented Thinking in the Czech Curriculum. Envigogika, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.714