Real World Learning: toward a differentiated framework for outdoor learning for sustainability
Keywords:Outdoor learning, Sustianability, Emancipatory learning, Instrumental learning
The Real World Learning network (RWLn) set out in 2011 to explore elements which contribute to a ‘deep and meaningful’ outdoor education experience. Following three years of work, the RWLn developed the ‘Hand Model’, a learning model designed to support educators in the development of Outdoor Learning for Sustainability (OLfS). Since its launch in early 2014, the model has been used for planning, delivering and reflecting upon OLfS experiences. Making use of the comments made in Činčera’s (2015) Real World Learning: a critical analysis which highlights inconsistencies existent within the model’s internal logic, this paper considers the perceived contradiction between emancipatory and instrumental approaches to learning. Beginning with a comprehensive introduction to the Hand model, this paper goes on to discuss the theoretical divide which the model spans between a goal-led, knowledge based approach promoted by the model’s focus upon understanding and values, and a pluralistic and exploratory approach typified by aspects of educational empowerment and experience. In response to this and augmented by examples, a differentiated conceptual framework is presented to facilitate a pragmatic application of the model from a practice perspective, making use of what has been termed a ‘blended approach’, whilst acknowledging degrees of inconsistency and dissonance from a theoretical perspective. Additionally, the model is viewed from a context perspective where questions are asked regarding the appropriateness of particular approaches depending upon the setting in which learning takes place. It is hoped that by moving beyond theoretically entrenched positions a mediated middle ground for the model’s application may be established.
Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of experimental social psychology, 22(5), 453-474.
Barr, S. (2008). Environment and society. Sustainability, Policy and the Citizen. Ashgate, London.
Beames, S. (2006). Losing my religion: The quest for applicable theory in outdoor education. Pathways. The Ontario Journal of Outdoor Education, 19(1), 4-11.
Beames, S., Higgins, P., & Nicol, R. (2012). Learning outside the classroom: theory and guidelines for practice: Routledge.
Bonnett, M. (2002). Education for sustainability as a frame of mind. Environmental Education Research, 8(1), 9-20.
Činčera, J. (2015). Real World Learning: a critical analysis. Envigogika, 10(3).
Curry, P. (2011). Ecological ethics: Polity.
Diehm, C. (2008). Staying True to Trees. Environmental Philosophy, 5(2), 3-16.
Higgins, P. (2009). Into the big wide world: Sustainable experiential education for the 21st century. Journal of Experiential Education, 32(1), 44-60.
Huckle, J., & Wals, A. E. (2015). The UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development: business as usual in the end. Environmental Education Research, 21(3), 491-505.
Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8-21.
Jickling, B. (1992). Viewpoint: Why I don't want my children to be educated for sustainable development. The Journal of Environmental Education, 23(4), 5-8.
Jickling, B., & Wals, A. (2008). Sustainable Development, Education, and Democracy: A Cautionary Tale. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Yale conference on Environmental Governance and Democracy• Institutions, public participation and environmental sustainability• Bridging research and capacity development.-Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Judson, G. (2015). The neglect of wonder and imagination in sustainability education. In F. K. David Selby (Ed.), Sustainability frontiers: Barbara Budrich.
Kopnina, H. (2012). Education for sustainable development (ESD): the turn away from ‘environment’in environmental education? Environmental Education Research, 18(5), 699-717.
Literacy, C. f. E. (2015). Ecological Principles. 2015
Nicol, R. (2014). Entering the Fray: The role of outdoor education in providing nature-based experiences that matter. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(5), 449-461.
Orr, D. W. (1992). Ecological literacy: Education and the transition to a postmodern world: Suny Press.
PIRC. (2011). Common Cause Handbook. http://valuesandframes.org/: PIRC.
RWL. (2014). Is there a frame providing a connecting story? In R. W. L. Network (Ed.). http://www.rwlnetwork.org/media/66672/frames_-_full_text.pdf: RWLn.
RWL. (2015). Are learners empowered to shape a sustianable future? Retrieved 2015
RWLn. (2015). Real World Learning Network.
Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 11.
Scottish Government. (2014). Curriculum for Excellence: Learning for Sustainability.
Selby, D., & Kagawa, F. (2015). Drawing threads together: a critical and transformative agenda for sustainability education. In D. Selby & F. Kagawa (Eds.), Sustainability Frontiers: Barbara Budrich.
Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable education. UK: Green Books Ltd.
Sterling, S. (2010). Learning for resilience, or the resilient learner? Towards a necessary reconciliation in a paradigm of sustainable education. Environmental Education Research, 16(5-6), 511-528.
Stern, P. C. (2000). Towards a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior, Journal of Social Issues, 56.
Wals, A. E. (2010). Message in a bottle: learning our way out of unsustainability: Wageningen University, Wageningen UR.
Wals, A. E., Geerling-Eijff, F., Hubeek, F., van der Kroon, S., & Vader, J. (2008). All mixed up? Instrumental and emancipatory learning toward a more sustainable world: Considerations for EE policymakers. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 7(3), 55-65.