Potential for social learning in sustainable regional development: analysis of stakeholder interaction with a focus on the role of scientists

Main Article Content

Jana Dlouhá
Martin Zahradník

Abstract

This article is concerned with regional development and its dimension of (un)sustainability: it analyses conditions for the success or failure of environmental or SD strategies from a social point of view. The authors share their experience acquired within the process of compiling a database of case studies from different regions of the Czech Republic and from abroad, and subsequently provide a brief analytical overview of cases in this special issue. The analytical perspective focuses on the roles of actors in a dialogue about regional sustainability issues within cooperative or conflict situations, and a description of the communication processes at play, especially within the science – policy interface. An analytical tool (actor analysis) is employed to explore network characteristics, the relationships of the actors involved and the process of deliberation itself where different approaches to “nature”, “environment”, and/or “sustainable development” were conceived but often not agreed upon. A comparative meta-analysis of different cases helped to formulate several hypotheses: for a successful sustainability transition on a regional level, future visions are necessary and should be discussed and shared by stakeholders. Necessary innovation is often the result of the involvement of experts and might be provided from outside the region. Dialogue should be based on respect for actor diversity and their viewpoints (this is a condition for social learning), as well as a commitment to contribute to the “common good”. Where local actors had only to choose between controversial extant solutions, a deadlock in communication often resulted. The establishment of a communication framework for actor involvement appeared to be beneficial, which is also an opportunity for facilitation of these processes in practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Dlouhá, J., & Zahradník, M. (2015). Potential for social learning in sustainable regional development: analysis of stakeholder interaction with a focus on the role of scientists. Envigogika, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.476
Section
Reviewed Papers
Author Biographies

Jana Dlouhá

RNDr. Jana Dlouhá, Ph.D.Environment CenterCharles University in PraguePrahaEnvigogika chief editor* I am an expert in environmental education and e-learning, my research position in the Charles University Environment Center includes coordination of national and international research and networking projects.* I have been teaching Czech and foreign students in the international study e-learning programs since 2007.* I am founder and editor in chief of the peer reviewed journal Envigogika (since 2006). * Since 2003 I am co-editor of the national environmental encyclopaedia Enviwiki (educational toolkit and Open Education Resource)

Martin Zahradník

Environment CenterCharles University in PraguePraha

References

Babbie, E. 2013. The practice of social research. Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Baranek, E. and B. Günther. 2005. Erfolgsfaktoren von Partizipation in Naturschutzgroßprojekten ‐ Das Beispiel: Moderationsverfahren im Gewässerrandstreifenprojekt Spreewald. In Partizipation, Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung, Nachhaltigkeit. Perspektiven der Politischen Ökonomie, eds. P.H. Feindt and J. Newig. Marburg: Metropolis‐Verlag: 299‐319.
Barton, A., & Dlouhá, J. (2014). Exploring regional sustainable development issues. Using the case study approach in higher education. In press
Burandt, S. 2014. Integration of Actor Analysis in Case Studies for (regional) Sustainable Development. Under review
Čada, K., Ptáčková, K. 2013. Possibilities and limits of collaboration between science and NGOs in the Czech Republic, Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 49, June 2013, pp. 25 34
Davis, C. & Wilcock, E. 2003. Teaching Materials Using Case Studies, The UK Centre for Materials Education. [online] [cit 2014-01-30] http://www.materials.ac.uk/guides/casestudies.asp
Dillon, J., & Reid, A. 2004. Issues in case-study methodology in investigating environmental and sustainability issues in higher education: towards a problem-based approach? Environmental Education Research, 10(1), 23–37.
Dlouhá, J., & Dlouhý, J. 2014. Higher education for sustainability – a change of education genre? (Vzdělávání pro udržitelnost na vysokých školách – jde o změnu vzdělávacího žánru?) Envigogika, 9(1). Available from http://envigogika.cuni.cz/index.php/Envigogika/article/view/440 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/18023061.440
Dlouhá, J., Barton, A. 2014. Students’ exploration of a Brown Coal Mining case study in higher education. In Barton, A. & Dlouhá, J. (eds.) Exploring regional sustainable development issues. Using the case study approach in higher education. In press
Dlouhá, J., Barton, A., Janoušková, S., & Dlouhý, J. 2013. Social learning indicators in sustainability-oriented regional learning networks, Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 49, June 2013, pp. 64 73.
Dryzek, J. 1997. The Politics of Earth, Environmental Discourses. New York: Oxford University Press.
Envigogika 2015. Vol 10, No 1
Enviwiki 2014. “Případy kauz udržitelného rozvoje” (Case studies of sustainable development). Avaliable from http://www.enviwiki.cz/wiki/Kategorie:P%C5%99%C3%ADpady_kauz_udr%C5%BEiteln%C3%A9ho_rozvoje
Fry H., Ketteridge S. and Marshall S. 1999. A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, Kogan Page, Glasgow, pp 408.
Funtowicz, S.O., Ravetz, J. R. 2002. Post-Normal Science – Environmental Policy under Conditions of Complexity, [online] [cit 2006-04-25], from
Hall, P. A. 1993. Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative politics, 25(3), 275–296.
Hermová, I. 2014. Druhý život Tuchomyšle: Lokální identita přesídlenců z odtěžené obce. (The Second Life of Tuchomyšl: Local Identity of Displaced People From a Strip-Mined Village) Envigogika, 9(2). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/18023061.435
Hessels, L. K., & Van Lente, H. 2008. Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda, Research policy, 37(4), 740–760.
Hogl, K., Kvarda, E., Nordbeck, R., Pregernig, M. 2012. Environmental Governance: The Challenge of Legitimacy and Effectiveness. Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Pub.
Kružíková, E. 2005. EU Accession and Legal Change: Accomplishments and Challenges in the Czech Case. In Carmin, J., VanDeveer, S. D. (2005). EU enlargement and the environment: institutional change and environmental policy in Central and Eastern Europe. New York, Routledge. ISBN 0-415-35186-3. pp. 99-113
Křenová, Z., Vrba, J. 2014. Just how many obstacles are there to creating a National Park? A case study from the Šumava National Park. European Journal of Environmental Sciences, 4(1). Retrieved from http://ejes.cz/index.php/ejes/arti-
cle/view/150
Labohý, J., Gaillyová, Y., & Machů, R. 2015. A sustainability assessment of the Hostětín cider house project. Envigogika, 10(1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/18023061.449
Mader, C. 2013. Sustainability process assessment on transformative potentials: the Graz Model for Integrative Development, Journal of cleaner production, 49, 54–63.
Mebratu, D. 1998. Sustainability and sustainable development: historical and conceptual review. Environmental impact assessment review, 18(6), 493–520. Dostupné z http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925598000195
Mikšíček, P. 2014. Objev údajně vyhubeného sídelního druhu uskutečněn na Königsmühle v Krušných horách. (Discovery of a supposed extinct settlement species made at Königsmühle in the Ore Mountains) Envigogika, 9(1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/18023061.441
Newig, J., Fritsch, O. 2009a. Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level – and effective? Environmental Policy and Governance, 19(3), 197–214. doi:10.1002/eet.509
Newig, J., Fritsch, O. 2009b. The case survey method and applications in political science. APSA 2009 Toronto Meeting Paper. [online] [2014-10-30] http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1451643
Očásková, I., Vrba, J., Průša, L. 2014. Revitalisation of Orlík reservoir – case study of a regional restoration project. European Journal of Environmental Sciences, 4(1). Retrieved from http://ejes.cz/index.php/ejes/article/view/152
Skalík, J. 2015. Debate about the Šumava National Park in the Czech Chamber of Deputies. Envigogika, 10(1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/18023061.429
Sol, J., Beers, P. J., & Wals, A. E. J. 2013. Social learning in regional innovation networks: Trust, commitment and reframing as emergent properties of interaction, Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 49, June 2013, pp. 35 43
Stake, R., E. 2006. Multiple Case Study Analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.
Sullivan, T., J., 1983. The Difficulties of Mandatory Negotiation (The Colstrip Power Plant Case). In Resolving Environmental Regulatory Disputes, eds. L. Susskind, L. Bacow and M. Wheeler. Cambridge: Schenkman Publishing Company: 56‐85.
Todd, S. 2002. Building consensus on divisive issues: a case study of the Yukon wolf management team. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 22: 655‐84.
Vaněk, M. 1996. It was not possible to breath here: ecology in the Czech Lands since 1968 till 1989 (Nedalo se tady dýchat : ekologie v českých zemích v letech 1968 až 1989), Praha, MAXDORF.
Vávra, J., Lapka, M., & Cudlínová, E. (2014). Curent Challenges of Central Europe. Praha: UK, Filosofická fakulta. ISBN 978-80-7308-551-3
Vavroušek, J., Moldan, B. (eds.). 1989. State and development of the environment in the Czech Republic. (Stav a vývoj životního prostředí v Československu) Ekological Section of the Czechoslovak Biological Society of the Academy of Sciences, Praha, 146 p.
Wals, A. E. 2009. Review of Contexts and Structures for Education for Sustainable Development, UNESCO, Paris, Section for DESD Coordination.
Wals, A. E. (ed.) 2007. Social learning towards a sustainable world, Wageningen Academic Publishers.
Wenger, E. 2000. Communities of practice and social learning systems, Organization, 7(2), 225.
Yin, R. K. 2014. Case study research: Design and methods, Sage, London.
Zahradník, M., Dlouhá, J., Burandt, S. Actor analysis as a tool for exploring the decision-making processes in environmental governance. In Barton, A. & Dlouhá, J. (eds.) Exploring regional sustainable development issues. Using the case study approach in higher education. In press
Záhumenská, V. 2014. Hradec Králové–ochrana přírodní památky Na Plachtě před zástavbou. Případová studie k významu účasti veřejnosti při ochraně životního prostředí. (Protecting the 'Na Plachtě' natural monument from development. A case study on the importance of public participation in environmental protection). Envigogika, 9(2). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/18023061.451
Zimmermann, A. & Maennling, C. (2007). Mainstreaming participation. Multi-stakeholder management: Tools for Stakeholder Analysis. Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH, Eschborn. Retrieved from http://www.fsnnetwork.org/sites/default/files/en-svmp-instrumente-akteuersanalyse.pdf