Actor analysis methodology

Main Article Content

Martin Zahradník

Abstract

The purpose of this methodology is to offer the actor analysis method to users from the area of policy development and enable application of the method in resolving concrete decision-making issues in the public domain. It aims to provide clear, step by step guidance for the analysis procedure, from problem definition and identification of social groups (actors), through a description of their characteristics to the proposal of practical solutions. Actor analysis primarily explores the social aspect of political debate in regional sustainable development. It is a tool for analysing the relationships among involved social actors, their different interests, roles, influence on development in the area of interest and related social capital within the overall networks of cooperation/competition. A clear understanding of the social environment allows the strengthening of desirable relations and reduction of potential conflicts. The presented methodology can thus help facilitate negotiation and governance processes, especially when different viewpoints, approaches, or practical concerns are anticipated, and a solution should be found in a participatory way. It can also be used for teaching purposes. At a practical level, it can serve to support environmental governance at local or regional level, but it is not limited to a specific field of application. Actor analysis is primarily future oriented, so the methodology can be successfully applied in planning and strategic decision making in various fields and social environments.

Article Details

How to Cite
Zahradník, M., & Dlouhá, J. (2016). Actor analysis methodology. Envigogika, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.527
Section
Methodologies
Author Biographies

Martin Zahradník

Charles University Environment Center

Jana Dlouhá

Researcher in Charles University Environment Centre; co-founder of the Enviwiki knowledge base; vice-president of international network of higher education institutions Copernicus Alliance. Concerned with transformative education and educational transformation in the light of sustainable development; interests span from digital media, open education resources, to social learning and participatory approaches in public dialogue.

References

BACC Author Team. (2008). “Assessment of Climate Change for the Baltic Sea Basin. Regional Clima-te Studies. Springer”. ISBN 978-3-540-72786-6
Bernard, J. (2015). Participace v ČR v sociologickém diskursu. Konference o participaci PAKT. Senát ČR. 14. 9. 2015
Boelens, L. (2010). “Theorizing Practice and Practising Theory: Outlines for an Actor-Relational-Approach in Plannig”. Planning Theory. Vol 9(1): 28–62. DOI: 10.1177/1473095209346499
Dlouhá, J., Huisingh, D., Barton, A. (2013). “Learning networks in higher education: Universities in search of making effective regional impacts”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 49. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.034
Dlouhá, J. (2014). “Sustainable development case studies and their use as a teaching method in regionally focused higher education programs”. in Barton, J., Dlouhá, J. (eds.). Exploring regional sustainable development issues. Using the case study approach in higher education. Grosvenor House Publishing LTD. Guildford
Enserink, B., Hermans, L. Kwakkel, J., Thissen, W., Koppenjan, J. Bots, P. (2010). Policy Analysis of Multi-Actor Systems. Boom Lemma Uitgevers, imprint of Eleven International Publishing, The Ha-gue, 175 pp. Available from: http://tudelftcourses.multimediaservices.nl/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Course-Book-4-Actor-Analysis.pdf
Fritsch, O., Newig, J. (2012). “Participatory Governance and Sustainability: Findings of a Meta-Analysis of Stakeholder Involvement in Environmental Decision Making”. in Brousseau, E., De-deurwaerdere, T., Siebenhüner, B. (eds.) Reflexive Governance for Global Public Goods. The MIT Press. London, UK. ISBN: 9780262301954
Harmáčková, Z., Rynda, I., Vačkář, D. (2014). Metodika rozvoje dlouhodobého sociálně-ekologického monitoringu (LTSER) v biosférických rezervacích České Republiky. Centrum výzkumu globální změny AV ČR, v. v. i., Fakulta humanitních studií, Univerzita Karlova v Praze. Dostupné z http://www.ecosystemservices.cz/userfiles/page/252/328b01dd6feb66d13585f79fff5d021a.pdf
HarmoniCOP Team. (2005). Learning together to manage together. Improving participation in wa-ter management. Harmonising collaborative planning. University of Osnabrück, Germany. Re-trieved from http://www.harmonicop.uni-osnabrueck.de/HarmoniCOPHandbook.pdf
Hermans, L. M., Thissen, W. A. H. (2009). “Actor analysis methods and their use for public policy analysts”. European Journal of Operational Research, 196, pp. 808–818
Hogl, K., Kvarda, E., Nordbeck, R., Pregernig, M. (2012). Environmental Governance: The Challenge of Legitimacy and Effectiveness. Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Pub
Jordová, R., Sperat, Z., Brůhová Foltýnová, H., Martinek, J. (2015). Metodika pro přípravu plánů udržitelné mobility měst České republiky, Brno, Centrum dopravního výzkumu, v. v. i.
Kastens, B., Newig, J. (2007). “The Water Framework Directive and Agricultural Nitrate Pollution: Will Great Expectations in Brussels be Dashed in Lower Saxony? ”. European Environment. 17(4), 231-246. DOI: 10.1002/eet.446
Layzer, J. A. (2008). Natural Experiments: Ecosystem-Based Management and the Environment, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Newig, J. (2007). “Does public participation in environmental decisions lead to improved environ-mental quality? Towards an analytical framework”. International Journal of Sustainability Commu-nication. 1 (1)
Newig, J., Fritsch, O. (2009). “Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level – and effecti-ve?”. Environmental Policy and Governance, 19(3), 197–214.
Newig, J. (2012). “More effective natural resource management through participatory governance? Taking stock of the conceptual and empirical literature – and moving forward”, in Hogl, K., Kvarda, E., Nordbeck, R., Pregernig, M. Environmental Governance: The Challenge of Legitimacy and Effectiveness. Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Pub.
Newig, J., Adzersen, A., Challies, E., Fritsch, O., Jager, N. (2013). Comparative analysis of public en-vironmental decision-making processes − a variable-based analytical scheme. Institute for Envi-ronmental and Sustainability Communication. Research Group Governance, Participation and Susta-inability. Leuphana University Luneburgh, Available from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2245518
OECD (2008). OECD Environmental Outlook to 2030. Paris: OECD. Dostupné z http://www.oecd-ilibra-ry.org/docserver/download/9708011e.pdf?expires=1418991901&id=id&accname=ocid57016075&checksum=7A6C0019E409E0FDBB28AB28C37B777C
Macnaghten, P., Jacobs, M. (1997). “Public identification with sustainable development: Investiga-ting cultural barriers to participation”. Global Environmental Change. 7: 5-24. doi:10.1016/S0959-3780(96)00023-4Ministerstvo pro místní rozvoj ČR. (2012). Metodika přípravy veřejných strategií. Dostupné z: http://www.mmr.cz/getmedia/4ebb3cc7-6f5c-4f37-ad1f-97054a212483/metodika-pripravy-verejnych-strategii_listopad-2012.pdf
Ministerstvo vnitra. (2009). Metodika zapojení veřejnosti do přípravy vládních dokumentů, Do-stupné z: http://www.vlada.cz/assets/ppov/lrv/ria/metodiky/Metodika-pro-zapojovani-verejnosti-do-pripravy-vladnich-dokumentu.pdf
MV ČR (2010). Manuál pro zapojování veřejnosti do přípravy vládních dokumentů Ministerstvo vni-tra, odbor efektivní veřejné správy. Online dostupné na www.mvcr.cz/soubor/manual-doc.aspx
PAKT. (2015a). Analýza občanské participace v České republice. Mička, P. (ed.), Agora CE, o.p.s. Do-stupné z: http://www.paktparticipace.cz/dokumenty/analyza
PAKT. (2015b). Metodika participace aneb jak spolupracovat s občany. Mička, P. (ed.) Pracovní verze doposud nepublikovaného textu dostupná z: http://www.paktparticipace.cz/dokumenty/metodika-participace
Pellizoni, L. (2003). “Uncertainity and Participatory Democracy”. Environmental Values. 12: 195 -224. DOI: 10.3197/096327103129341298
Pergler, P. (2015). Interní podklady pro jednání Platformy UR, COŽP UK
Enviwiki (2015). “Případy kauz udržitelného rozvoje”. Dostupné z: http://www.enviwiki.cz/wiki/Kategorie:P%C5%99%C3%ADpady_kauz_udr%C5%BEiteln%C3%A9ho_rozvoje
Stachová, J., Bernard, J., Čermák, D. (2009). Sociální kapitál v České republice a v mezinárodním srovnání. Sociologické studie, 5. Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v.v.i.
Steele, J. (2001). “Participation and Deliberation in Environmental Law: Exploring a Problem‐solving Approach”. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 21(3): 415-442. doi: 10.1093/ojls/21.3.415
Strategický rámec udržitelného rozvoje ČR (2010). Usnesení vlády ČR č. 37. MŽP ČR, http://www.mzp.cz/cz/strategie_udrzitelneho_rozvoje
Veselý, A., Nekola, M. (2007) Analýza a tvorba veřejných politik: přístupy, metody a praxe. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství, 2007. ISBN 978-80-86429-75-5
Zimmermann, A., Maennling, C. (2007). Mainstreaming participation. Multi-stakeholder ma-nagement: Tools for Stakeholder Analysis. Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Develo-pment. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH, Eschborn. 30 January 2014, Dostupné z: http://www.fsnnetwork.org/sites/default/files/en-svmp-instrumente-akteuersanalyse.pdf