Environmental Economics And Policy: Course Evaluation Survey

Main Article Content

Petr Šauer
Martin Zahradník

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to outline the educational aspects of environmental economics referring to an example of a course taught at The University of Economics, Prague.A quantitative survey among students was conducted to describe their perceptions of the environmental topics and the diverse components of the course. This learners’ perspective is compared with students’ examination results and their level of activity in seminars. One of the main questions asked in this text is: do students interested in economic policy and regional economics consider the environmental orientation of the course important? And if yes what aspects of the course do they value, what benefits do they get from the course, what are their learning strategies and what role does this play with regards to students’ concern for environmental issues?Probably the most important finding of the research is the students’ advocacy of environmental economics as a beneficial part of curriculum both by those clustered as ‘environmentalists’ and ‘non-environmentalists’ (or even ‘anti-environmentalists’). Students appreciate having a chance to participate actively in the course. A well balanced proportion of lectures and seminars with enough space for deep discussion seem to be crucial for retaining students’ interest. The data doesn’t equip us with sufficient information to construct regression models with reasonable predictive power concerning exam results. A challenge for further research is to work with a better informed analysis of students’ learning strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Šauer, P., & Zahradník, M. (2013). Environmental Economics And Policy: Course Evaluation Survey. Envigogika, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.380
Section
Reviewed Papers
Author Biographies

Petr Šauer

Director of theInstitute for Sustainable Business, and associated professor at Department of Political Sciences, Faculty of International Relations, University of Economics in PragueandProfessor of Environmental Economics, h. c., Delhi School of Professional Studies and ResearchIndia Field of interest: environmental economics and policy, voluntary environmental contracts, effectiveness of environmental investments, ecological tax reform. methodology of environmental policy assesment;application of small laboratory teaching experiments and case studies in teaching/learning process.

Martin Zahradník

Environment CenterCharles University in PraguePrague

References

Arbuthnott, K. D. (2009). “Education for sustainable development beyond attitude change”, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Vol. 10 No 2. pp. 152-163.
Dlouhá, J. (2009). “Competences in environmental education”, Envigogika, Vol. 4, No. 1 [online] Available at: http://envigogika.cuni.cz/index.php/cs/texty/20091/300-kompetence-v-environmenta lnim-vzdlani, [Accessed 16.3.2010].
Dunlap, R.E., Van Liere, K.D., Mertig, A.G. and Jones R.E.(2000). “Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale”, Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 425–442.
Franěk, M. (2012). Nature Relatedness Scale. Český překlad škály měřící spojení s přírodou. Envigogika, 7(1). Dostupné z http://www.envigogika.cuni.cz/index.php/Envigogika/article/view/69
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2009). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Transaction Publishers.
Lozano, R. (2006). “Incorporation and institutionalisation of SD into universities:
breaking through barriers to change”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 14, pp. 787-796.
Sauer, P. (2007). “How to teach applied environmental economics”. International Journal of Business, Management and Economics, Vol. 3, No. 9, pp. 43–50.
Sleurs, W. et al (2008). “Competencies for ESD (Education for Sustainable Development) teachers: A framework to integrate ESD in the curriculum of teacher training institute”, Comenius 2.1 project 118277-CP-1-2004-BE-Comenius-C2.1, Brussels, on-line: http://www.unece.org/env/esd/inf.meeting.docs/EGonInd/8mtg/CSCT%20Handbook_Extract.pdf, [Accessed 12.4.2010].
Soukup, P. (2001). “ISSP- The Environment”, Sociological Studies, Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic No. 6.
Wendy Stubbs, W. and Cocklin, Ch. (2008). “Teaching sustainability to business students: shifting mindsets”, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Vol. 9 No 3, pp. 206-221.
Wright, T. S. A. (2007). “Developing research priorities with a cohort of higher
education for sustainability experts”, International Journal of Sustainability in
Higher Education, Vol. 8, pp. 34-43.
UNECE (2008). Steering Committee on Education for Sustainable Development. The Reporting Format (Advance copy of ECE/CEP/AC.13/2008/2/Add.1) [Online] Available at: http://www.unece.org/env/esd/inf.meeting.docs/SC/SC-3/ece.cep.ac.13.2008.2.add.1.e.AC.pdf, [Accessed 10.4.2010].
Zsóka, A., Szerényi, Z. M., Széchy, A., & Kocsis, T. (2013). “Greening due to environmental education? Environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer behavior and everyday pro-environmental activities of Hungarian high school and university students.”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 48, pp. 126-138.