Evaluation of the quality of outdoor digital interpretation of natural heritage


  • Jan Činčera Masaryk university, Faculty of social science https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0704-7402
  • Michal Medek Czech Institute for Heritage Interpretation
  • Miroslav Lupač Koniklec Agency




Interpretation of natural heritage, digitalisation, evaluation, quality


The study discusses the question of quality of field digital interpretation of natural heritage. It describes the process of defining the quality criteria, encompassing a combination of literature review, focus groups with experts, and field survey. In the last part it introduces and discusses the key quality criteria for recommendation for further authors of digital interpretation.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Jan Činčera, Masaryk university, Faculty of social science

The author is an associate professor at Masaryk University of Brno (Faculty of social science, Department of environmental studies). He focuses on theory, methodics and evaluation of environmental education and education for sustainable development. He cooperates with environmental education centres as a programme evaluator and consultant.

Michal Medek, Czech Institute for Heritage Interpretation

Czech Institute for Heritage Interpretation

Miroslav Lupač, Koniklec Agency

Koniklec Agency


Beck, L., & Cable, T. (2011). The Gifts of Interpretation. Urbana: Sagamore publishing.

Davies, J. (2014). On-site Digital Heritage Interpretation : Current uses and future possibilities at World Heritage Sites. Durham: Durham University.

Ham, S. H. (2013). Interpretation – making a difference on purpose. Golden: Fulcrum Publishing.

Ham, S. H. (1992). Environmental interpretation : a practical guide for people with big ideas and small budgets. Colorado: Fulcrum Publishing.

Liarokapis, F., Sylaiou, S., & Mountain, D. (2008). Personalizing Virtual and Augmented Reality for Cultural Heritage Indoor and Outdoor Experiences. In The 9th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, VAST (2008), pp. 1–8.

Lindell, S. K. (2014). Reconciling technology and nature : the use of mobile technology in outdoor recreation. Thesis. Western Washington University.

Pendit, U. C., Aida, J., & Bakar, A. (2014). Mobile Augmented Reality for Enjoyable Informal Learning in Cultural Heritage Site. International Journal of Computer Applications, 92(14), 19-26.

Shin, D., Jung, J., & Chang, B. (2014). The psychology behind QR codes : User experience perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1417–1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.004

Taggmanager.cz (2017). Naše stezky. Retrieved from http://www.taggmanager.cz/reference

Tilden, F. (1957). Interpreting our heritage: Principles and Practices for Visitor Services. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

Veverka, J. A. (2011). The interpretative training handbook. Edinburgh: MuseumsEtc.

Walmsley, J. & Crowe, L. (2016). What makes a good smartphone app for outdoor recreation? Outdoor recreation network, 27. Retrieved from https://www.outdoorrecreation.org.uk/stories/makes-good-smartphone-app-outdoor-recreation/

Zecha, S. (2012). Geocaching, a tool to support environmental education!?– An explorative study. Educational Research eJournal, 1(2), 177–188.

Zimmerman, H.T. & Land, S.M. (2015). Facilitating place-based learning in outdoor informal environments with mobile computers. TechTrends, 58(1), 77-83.


05. 04. 2018

How to Cite

Činčera, J., Medek, M., & Lupač, M. (2018). Evaluation of the quality of outdoor digital interpretation of natural heritage. Envigogika, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.560



Reviewed Papers

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.