The methodology for evaluation of environmental education programmes for adults

Main Article Content

Jan Činčera

Abstract

The methodology provides a comprehensive overview of instruments aimed for evaluation of environmental education programmes for adults. It introduces specific featurs of evaluation of programmes focused on this target group and defines relevant variables for environmental education. It compares and contrasts differences between evaluation of community-based programmes, professional training courses, and environmental interpretation programmes. It compares and discusses strategies for their quantitative and qualitative evaluation. Examples of evaluation research from Czech and abroad are provided.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Činčera, J. (2013). The methodology for evaluation of environmental education programmes for adults. Envigogika, 8(5). https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.415
Section
Methodologies
Author Biography

Jan Činčera

Technical University of Liberec, Department of Education and Psychology & Masaryk University Brno, Department of Environmental Studies

References

ARGYRIS, C. (1976). Single-Loop and Double-Loop Models in Research on Decision Making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21 (3), 363-375.
ARGYRIS, C. (1995). Action science and organizational learning. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 10 (6), 20–26.
ADOMSSENT, M. & MICHELSEN, G. (2006). German academia heading for sustainability? Reflection on policy and practice in teaching, research and institutional innovation. Environmental education research, 12, 1, 85-99.
AJZEN, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, vol. 50, 179-211.
AMBURGEY, J.W. & THOMAN, D.B. (2012). Dimensionality of the New ecological paradigm: issues of factor structure and measurement. Environment and Behavior, 44, 2, 235-256.
ARDOIN, N.M., SCHUH, J.S. & GOULD, R.K. (2012). Exploring the dimensions of place: a confirmatory factor analysis of data from three ecoregional sites. Environmental Education Research, 18, 5, 583-607.
BACK, L. & CABLE, T. (2002). Interpretation for the 21st century. Champaign : Sagamore publishing.
BANDURA, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84 (2), 191-215.
BENNETT, D. B. (1989). Evaluating Environmental Education in Schools. A practical guide for teachers. UNESCO - UNEP, Division of Science, Technical and Environmental Education. Dostupné z WWW: < http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0006/000661/066120eo.pdf >
BEŇKOVÁ, V. & ČINČERA, J. (2010). Prožitkové naučné stezky jako prostředek environmentální interpretace krajiny. Envigogika, 5, č. 2. Dostupné z < http://www.envigogika.cuni.cz/index.php/cz/recenze/98-internat/jine/398-proitkove-naune-stezky-jako-prostedek-environmentalni-interpretace-krajiny>
BOYES, E., CHAMBERS, W. & STANISSTREET, M. (1995). Trainee primary teachers’ ideas about the ozone layer. Environmental Education Research, 1, 2, p. 133-145.
BROUKAL, V., TOUŠKOVÁ, B. & BROUKALOVÁ, L. (2012). Výroční zpráva 2011. Praha: Sdružení středisek ekologické výchovy Pavučina.
BROUKALOVÁ, L. a kol. (2012). Cíle a indikátory pro environmentální vzdělávání, výchovu a osvětu v České republice. Praha: Ministerstvo životního prostředí České republiky. Dostupné z WWW:
CASAKIN, H. & BILLIG, M. (2009). Effect on settlement size and religiozity on sense of place in communcal settlements. Environment and behavior, 41, 6, 821-835.
CORDANO, M., WELCOMER, S. A. & SCHERER, R. F. (2003). An analysis of the predictive validity of the new ecological paradigm scale. The Journal of Environmental Education, 34, 3, 22–28.
COX, J.R. (2009). Environmental communication and the public sphere. Washington: SAGE.
ČINČERA, J. & BEZOUŠKA, A. (2007). Vliv environmentální profilace středních škol na proenvironmentální postoje a jednání žáků. Envigogika, 2, 3. Dostupné z WWW: < http://www.envigogika.cuni.cz/index.php/en/redakcni-rada/21-recenzovane-clanky-reviewed-papers/envigogika-2010v1/145-vliv-environmentalni-profilace-stednich-kol-na-proenvironmentalni-postoje-a-jednani-student >
ČINČERA, J., GILAR, P. & SOKOLOVIČOVÁ, J. (2010). Specializační studium pro koordinátory environmentální výchovy, vzdělávání a osvěty: interpretace a efektivita z pohledu absolventů. Envigogika, 5, 1. Dostupné z < http://envigogika.cuni.cz/index.php/en/recenzovane-clanky/2009/20091/90-informace-information/20092/382-specializani-studium-pro-koordinatory-environmentalni-vychovy-vzdlavani-a-osvty-interpretace-a-efektivita-z-pohledu-absolvent->
ČINČERA, J., KOHOUTOVÁ, K. & SOKOLOVIČOVÁ, J. (2010). Účastníci specializačního studia pro koordinátory environmentální výchovy: očekávání, hodnocení a první přínosy. Envigogika. 5, 3. Dostupné z < http://www.envigogika.cuni.cz/index.php/en/recenze/103-novinky/zajimavosti/431-metodika-evaluace-program-environmentalni-vychovy>
ČINČERA, J. & ŠTĚPÁNEK, P. (2007). Výzkum ekologické gramotnosti studentů středních odborných škol Envigogika, 2, 1. Dostupné z WWW: < http://www.envigogika.cuni.cz/index.php/en/texty/20071/62-vyzkum-ekologicke-gramotnosti-student-stednich-odbornych-kol-12007-1-ast >
ČINČERA, J. (2010). Metodika evaluace programů environmentální výchovy. Envigogika, 5, 3. Dostupné z WWW: < http://www.envigogika.cuni.cz/index.php/en/recenze/103-novinky/zajimavosti/431-metodika-evaluace-program-environmentalni-vychovy >
DAUDI, S.S. (2000). Environmental literacy: a challenging concept for neo-literate communities? Washington: NAAEE conference proceedings.
DIAMOND, J., LUKE J.J. & UTTAL, D.H. (2009). Practical evaluation guide. Tool for museums and other informal educational settings. Plymouth: Altamira Press.
DILLON, P.J. & GAYFORD, C.G. (1997). A psychometric approach to investigating the environmental beliefs, intentions and behaviours of pre-service teachers. Environmental Education Research, 3, 3, 283-297.
DISINGER, J. F. (1997). Environment in the K-12 Curriculum: An Overview. In WILKE, Richard J. Environmental Education. Teacher Ressource Handbook. A Practical Guide for K-12 Environmental Education. Thousand Oaks: Corwin, 23-44.
DISINGER, J.F. & ROTH, C.F. (1992) Environmental literacy. ERIC Clearinghouse for Science Mathematics and Environmental Education, ED3512012. Dostupné z WWW: < http://www.ericdigests.org/1992-1/literacy.htm >
DOVE, J. (1996). Student teacher understanding of the greenhouse effect, ozone layer depletion and acid rain. Environmental Education Research, 2, 1, 89-100.
DUNLAP, R. E. (2008). The New environmental paradigm scale: from marginality to worldwide use. The Journal of environmental education, 40, 1, 3-18.
DUNLAP, R.E. & VAN LIERE, K.D. (1978). The „new environmental paradigm“: A proposed instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education, 9,4,10-19.
DUNLAP, R.E., VAN LIERE, K.D., MERTIG, A.G. & JOHNSON, R.E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revisited NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425-442.
DUTCHER, D., FINLEY, J., LULOFF, A., & JOHNSON, J. (2007). Connectivity with nature as a measure of environmental values. Environment and Behavior, 39, 474-493.
DVOŘÁČKOVÁ, S., RYPLOVÁ, R. (2012). Sonda environmentální gramotnosti studentů přírodovědně a ekologicky zaměřených oborů na Pedagogické fakultě JU. Envigogika, 7, 3, Dostupné z WWW:
ERNST, J.A., MONROE, M.C. & SIMMONS, B. (2009). Evaluating your environmental education program. A workbook for practitioners. Washington: NAAEE.
FIELDING, K.S. & HEAD, B.W. (2012). Determinants of young Autralians’ environmental actions: the role of responsibility, locus of control, knowledge and attitudes. Environmental Education Research, 18, 2, 171-186.
FITZPATRICK, J. L., SANDERS, J. R. & WORTHEN, B. R. (2004). Program Evaluation. Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. Boston: Pearson Education.
FRANĚK, M. (2012). Nature Relatedness Scale. Český překlad nástroje. Envigogika, 7, 1. Dostupné z WWW:
FRANĚK, M. (2006). Výzkum antropocentrických a biocentrických postojů k přírodě v české populaci. In STREJČKOVÁ, Emilie. Výzkum odcizování člověka přírodě : Závěrečná zpráva [online]. Praha: Toulcův dvůr, 2006.
FRECHTLING, J. et. al. (2002). The 2002 User-Friendly Handbook for Project Evaluation. The National Science Foundation. Dostupné z WWW:
GLASER, B. G., (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. San Franciso: Sociology Press.
GLASER, B. G., (1998). Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.
GOLDMAN, D., YAVETZ, B. & PE’ER, S. (2006). Environmental literacy in Teacher training in Israel: Environmental Behavior of New Studies. The Journal of Environmental Education, 38, 1, 3-23.
HAM, S. H. (1992). Environmental interpretation: a practical guide for people with big ideas and small budgets. Colorado: Fulcrum Publishing.
HAYWARD,G., DIDUCK, A. & MITCHELL, B. (2007). Social Learning Outcomes in the Red River Floodway Environmental Assessment. Environmental Practice, 9, 4, 239-250.
HSU, S.-J. & ROTH, R.E. (1998). An assessment of environmental literacy and analysis of predictors of responsible environmental behavior held by secondary teachers in the Hualien area of Taiwan. Environmental Education Research, 4,3, 229-249.
HUNGERFORD, H.R. & VOLK, T. L. (1990). Changing Learner Behavior through Environmental Education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 3, 8-21.
IGNAT, A.A. & CLIPA, O. (2010). The Impact of Self-Efficacy and Locus of Control on the Professional Development of the Teachers. Buletinul Universitatii Petrol-Gaze din Ploiesti, 12 (1), 180-185.
KIRKPATRICK, D.L. & KIRKPATRICK, J.D. (2007). Implementing the four levels. A practical guide for effective evaluation of training programs. San Franciso: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
KNAPP, D., VOLK, T. L. & HUNGERFORD, H. R. (1997). The identification of empirically derived goals for program development in environmental interpretation. The Journal of Environmental Education. 3, 24-34.
KNAPP, D. (1997). Environmental Education and Environmental Interpretation: The Relationships. National Association for Interpretation, 3, 349-356.
KUDRYAVTSEV, A., STEDMAN, R.C., KRASNY, M.E. (2012). Sense of place in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 18,2,229-250.
KUSTERS, C.S.L. et al. (2011). Making evaluation matter: a practical guide for evaluators. Wageningen: Centre for development and innovation, Wageningen university.
KYLE, G., GRAEFFE, A., MANNING, R. (2005). Testing the dimensionality of place attachment in recreational settings. Environment and Behavior, 37, 2, 153-177.
LaLONDE, R. & JACKSON, E. L. (2002). The New Environmental Paradigm scale: Has it outlived its usefulness? The Journal of Environmental Education, 32, 4, 28–37.
LaTROBE, H. L. & ACOTT, T. G. (2002). A modified NEP/DSP environmental attitudes scale. The Journal of Environmental Education, 32, 1, 1–12.
LUKAS, K.E. & ROSS, S.R. (2005). ZOO visitor knowledge and attitudes toward gorillas and chimpanzes. The Journal of environmental education, 36, 4, 33-48.
LUNDMARK, C. (2007). The new ecological paradigm revisited: anchoring the NEP scale in environmental ethics. Environmental education research, 13, 3,329-347.
MADIN, E.M.P. & FENTON, D. M. (2004). Environmental Interpretation in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park: An Assessment of Programme Effectiveness. Journal of sustainable tourism, 12, 2,121-137.
MATĚJČEK, T. & BARTOŠ, J. (2012). Environmentální gramotnost učitelů a studentů učitelství. Envigogika, 7, 2, Dostupné z WWW: http://envigogika.cuni.cz/index.php/cz/recenzovane-clanky/2012/envigogika-2012-vii-2/698-environmentalni-gramotnost-ucitelu-a-studentu-ucitelstvi
MAYER, F.S., McPHERSON FRANTZ, C., BRUEHLMAN-SENECAL, E. & DOLLIVER, K. (2009). Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and behavior, 41, 5, 607-645.
MAYER, S. F., & FRANTZ, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503-515.
MEASHAM, T.G. 2009. Social Learning Through Evaluation: A Case study of Overcoming Constraints for Management Dryland Salinity. Environmental Management, 43,1096-1107.
MEZIROW, J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult. Core concepts of transformation theory. In Mezirow, Jack et. al. (ed.) (2000): Learning as Transformation. Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 3-33.
MORRONE, M., MANCL, K. & CARR, K. (2001). Development of a metric to test group differences in ecological knowledge as one component of environmental literacy. The Journal of Environmental Education, 32, 4, 33–43.
MOSELY, C. & REINKE, K. (2005). The Effect of Teaching in an Outdoor Environmental Education Program on Elementary Pre-service Teachers’ Environmental Education Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectancy. In B. Simmons (Ed.) Preparing Effective Environmental Educators. Washington: NAAEE. P. 35-58.
MUNRO, J.K. & MORRISON-SAUNDERS, A. (2008). Environmental interpretation evaluation in natural areas. Journal of ecotourism, 8, 1, 1-14.
NISBET, E. K., ZELENSKI, J. M. & MURPHY, S. A. (2009). The Nature relatedness scale. Linking individuals' connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41, 5, 715-740.
PASTOROVÁ, M. a kol. (2011a). Doporučené očekávané výstupy. Metodická podpora pro výuku průřezových témat na základních školách. Praha: Výzkumný ústav pedagogický. Dostupné z WWW: < http://www.vuppraha.cz/nova-publikace-divize-vup-%E2%80%93-doporucene-ocekavane-vystupy-pro-zakladni-skoly >
PASTOROVÁ, M. a kol. (2011b). Doporučené očekávané výstupy. Metodická podpora pro výuku průřezových témat v gymnáziích. Praha: Národní ústav pro vzdělávání, školské poradenské zařízení a zařízení pro další vzdělávání pedagogických pracovníků. Dostupné z WWW : http://digifolio.rvp.cz/artefact/file/download.php?file=35427&view=4001
PATTON, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
PATTON, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-Focused Evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
POSTAREFF, L. (2007). Teaching in Higher Education. From Content-focused to Learning-focused Approaches to Training. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
PE’ ER, S., GOLDMAN, D. & YAVETZ, B. (2007). Environmental literacy in teacher training: attitudes, knowledge, and environmental behavior of beginning students. The Journal of Environmental Education, 39, 1, 45-59.
RIST, S, CHIDDAMBARANATHAN, M., ESCOBAR, C. & WIESMANN, U. (2006). “It was Hard to Come to Mutual Understanding . . .”—The Multidimensionality of Social Learning Processes Concerned with Sustainable Natural Resource Use in India, Africa and Latin America. Syst Pract Act Res, 19, 219–237.
ROSSI, P. H., LIPSEY, M.W. & FREEMAN, H.E. (2004). Evaluation. A Systemic Approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
SCHOVAJSOVÁ, J. (2010). Současný stav environmentální výchovy na základních školách – vybrané aspekty environmentální gramotnosti dětí mladšího školního věku. Disertační práce. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého.
SCHNEIDER, F., FRY, P., LEDERMAN, T. & RIST, S. (2009). Social Learning Processes in Swiss Soil Protection – The “From Farmer – To Farmer” Project. Human Ecology, 37, 475-489.
SCHULTZ, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 327-339.
SIMMONS, B. (2008). Designing Evaluation for Education Projects. Office of Education and Sustainable Development. Dostupné z WWW:
SOUKUP, P. (2001). ISSP: životní prostředí. Praha: Sociologický ústav Akademie věd České republiky.
STABLES, A. & BISHOP, K. (2001). Weak and Strong Conceptions of Environmental Literacy: implications for environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 7, 1, 89-97.
STOKKING, H., VAN AERT, L., MEIJBERG, W & KASKENS, A. (1999). Evaluating Evironmental Education. IUCN Commission on Education and Communication CEC. Dostupné z WWW:
SWANAGAN, J. S. (2000). Factors influencing ZOO visitors’ conservation attitudes and behavior. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31, 4, 26-31.
TILDEN, F. (2007). Interpreting Our Heritage. Chapell Hill: University of North Carolina.
TUNCER, G., TEKKAYA, C., SUNGUR, S., CAKIROGLU, J., ERTEPINAR, H., KAPLOWITZ, M. (2009). Assessing pre-service teachers’ environmental literacy in Turkez as a mean to develop teacher education programs. International Journal of Educational Development, 29, 4, 426-436.
VAN PETEGEM & P., BLIECK, A. (2006). The environmental worldview of children: a cross-cultural perspective. Environmental Education Research, 12, 5, 625-635.
VIKAN, A., CAMINO, C., BIAGGIO, A. & NORDVIK, H. (2007). Endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a comparison of two Brazilian samples and one Norwegian sample. Environment and Behavior, 39, 2, 317-228
WALS, A. (2012). Learning our way out of unsustainability: the role of environmental education. In Clayton, S. The Oxford Handbook of Environment and Conservation. Oxford: Oxford university press, 628-644.
WALS, A., GEERLING-EIJFF, F., HUBEEK, F., VAN DER KROON, S. & VADER, J. (2008). All mixed up? Instrumental and emancipator learning toward a more sustainable world: considerations for EE policymakers. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 7, 55-65.
WALS, A.E.J. (ed.) 2007. Social learning: towards a sustainable world: principles, perspectives, and praxis. Wageningen Academic,Wageningen, Netherlands
WENGER, E. 2000. Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems. Organization, 7, 2, 225-246.
WHOLEY, J.S., HATRY H.P. & NEWCOMER, K.E. (2004). Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
WRIGHT, M.J. (2008) . The Comparative Effects of Constructivist Versus Traditional Teaching Methods on the Environmental Literacy of Postsecondary Nonscience Majors. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 28, 4, 324-337.
YAVETZ, B., GOLDMAN, D. & PE’ER, S. (2009). Environmental literacy of pre-service teachers in Israel: a comparison between students at the onset and end of their studies. Environmental education research, 15, 4, 393-415.